What He Really Meant

I just wanted to take a minute to explain the following. My intent with the following exercise is not to attack Christianity, so a little clarification is probably in order.

For better or for worse, when George W. Bush speaks to the world, as he did yesterday with his 2nd inaugural address, he speaks for the entire nation. I understand that he and his supporters are largely comprised of fundamentalist Christians whose interpretation of their own faith mandates that they witness to others and spread the word of god wherever they go, but Bush is supposed to represent all of us in these United States, not just a subsection of the nation. Given that the majority of people in the world are not Christians, do we really want to continue to send a message of religious intolerance? Bush may not have said exactly what I represent in the speech below, but the metaphors are so thinly veiled as to be completely obvious to anyone who knows anything about Bush and his speechwriters, let alone his supporters. What many of us are seeing today from this administration is a continuation of the Crusades. It’s all well and good to speak about god and god’s influence in your personal life, but to convert this into a mission that you’ve been appointed to perform on behalf of the almighty in the name of an entire country is quite another thing. I’m not exaggerating here. Bush has, in the past, not only mentioned that god told him to run for president, but has also suggested that non-Christians won’t go to heaven. Spreading religious intolerance is not the message that a President should be sending on the day of his inauguration, when the world is tuning in to see what tone the administration will take in the next term… As if they didn’t already know. Anyway, my point here is not to trash Christianity, but to just once again cut through the doublespeak and hidden motives of this administration.

To that end, I have taken the initiative to substitute the word “Christianity” for every mention of “Freedom” in Bush’s second inaugural speech, and “God’s message” for every mention of “liberty.” After all, this is what he really meant. When he says “we’re spreading freedom,” what he’d really like to say is, “we’re spreading the Word of God,” so why not just come out and say it? Here, for your reading pleasure, is the speech that Bush meant to give:

Vice President Cheney, Mr. Chief Justice, President Carter, President Bush, President Clinton, reverend clergy, distinguished guests, fellow citizens:

On this day, prescribed by law and marked by ceremony, we celebrate the durable wisdom of our Constitution, and recall the deep commitments that unite our country. I am grateful for the honor of this hour, mindful of the consequential times in which we live, and determined to fulfill the oath that I have sworn and you have witnessed.

At this second gathering, our duties are defined not by the words I use, but by the history we have seen together. For a half century, America defended our own Christianity by standing watch on distant borders. After the shipwreck of communism came years of relative quiet, years of repose, years of sabbatical – and then there came a day of fire.

We have seen our vulnerability – and we have seen its deepest source. For as long as whole regions of the world simmer in resentment and tyranny – prone to ideologies that feed hatred and excuse murder – violence will gather, and multiply in destructive power, and cross the most defended borders, and raise a mortal threat. There is only one force of history that can break the reign of hatred and resentment, and expose the pretensions of tyrants, and reward the hopes of the decent and tolerant, and that is the force of human Christianity.

We are led, by events and common sense, to one conclusion: The survival of God’s message in our land increasingly depends on the success of God’s message in other lands. The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of Christianity in all the world.

America’s vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one. From the day of our Founding, we have proclaimed that every man and woman on this earth has rights, and dignity, and matchless value, because they bear the image of the Maker of Heaven and earth. Across the generations we have proclaimed the imperative of self-government, because no one is fit to be a master, and no one deserves to be a slave. Advancing these ideals is the mission that created our Nation. It is the honorable achievement of our fathers. Now it is the urgent requirement of our nation’s security, and the calling of our time.

So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.

This is not primarily the task of arms, though we will defend ourselves and our friends by force of arms when necessary. Christianity, by its nature, must be chosen, and defended by citizens, and sustained by the rule of law and the protection of minorities. And when the soul of a nation finally speaks, the institutions that arise may reflect customs and traditions very different from our own. America will not impose our own style of government on the unwilling. Our goal instead is to help others find their own voice, attain their own Christianity, and make their own way.

The great objective of ending tyranny is the concentrated work of generations. The difficulty of the task is no excuse for avoiding it. America’s influence is not unlimited, but fortunately for the oppressed, America’s influence is considerable, and we will use it confidently in Christianity’s cause. My most solemn duty is to protect this nation and its people against further attacks and emerging threats. Some have unwisely chosen to test America’s resolve, and have found it firm. We will persistently clarify the choice before every ruler and every nation: The moral choice between oppression, which is always wrong, and Christianity, which is eternally right. America will not pretend that jailed dissidents prefer their chains, or that women welcome humiliation and servitude, or that any human being aspires to live at the mercy of bullies.

We will encourage reform in other governments by making clear that success in our relations will require the decent treatment of their own people. America’s belief in human dignity will guide our policies, yet rights must be more than the grudging concessions of dictators; they are secured by free dissent and the participation of the governed. In the long run, there is no justice without Christianity, and there can be no human rights without [the humanity of] God’s message.

Some, I know, have questioned the global appeal of God’s message – though this time in history, four decades defined by the swiftest advance of Christianity ever seen, is an odd time for doubt. Americans, of all people, should never be surprised by the power of our ideals. Eventually, the call of Christianity comes to every mind and every soul. We do not accept the existence of permanent tyranny because we do not accept the possibility of permanent slavery. God’s message will come to those who love it.

Today, America speaks anew to the peoples of the world: All who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know: the United States will not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for your God’s message, we will stand with you. Democratic reformers facing repression, prison, or exile can know: America sees you for who you are: the future leaders of your free country. The rulers of outlaw regimes can know that we still believe as Abraham Lincoln did: “Those who deny Christianity to others deserve it not for themselves; and, under the rule of a just God, cannot long retain it.”

The leaders of governments with long habits of control need to know: To serve your people you must learn to trust them. Start on this journey of progress and justice, and America will walk at your side.

And all the allies of the United States can know: we honor your friendship, we rely on your counsel, and we depend on your help. Division among free nations is a primary goal of Christianity’s enemies. The concerted effort of free nations to promote democracy is a prelude to our enemies’ defeat.

Today, I also speak anew to my fellow citizens: From all of you, I have asked patience in the hard task of securing America, which you have granted in good measure. Our country has accepted obligations that are difficult to fulfill, and would be dishonorable to abandon. Yet because we have acted in the great liberating tradition of this nation, tens of millions have achieved their Christianity. And as hope kindles hope, millions more will find it. By our efforts, we have lit a fire as well – a fire in the minds of men. It warms those who feel its power, it burns those who fight its progress, and one day this untamed fire of Christianity will reach the darkest corners of our world.

A few Americans have accepted the hardest duties in this cause – in the quiet work of intelligence and diplomacy … the idealistic work of helping raise up free governments … the dangerous and necessary work of fighting our enemies. Some have shown their devotion to our country in deaths that honored their whole lives – and we will always honor their names and their sacrifice. All Americans have witnessed this idealism, and some for the first time. I ask our youngest citizens to believe the evidence of your eyes. You have seen duty and allegiance in the determined faces of our soldiers. You have seen that life is fragile, and evil is real, and courage triumphs. Make the choice to serve in a cause larger than your wants, larger than yourself – and in your days you will add not just to the wealth of our country, but to its character.

America has need of idealism and courage, because we have essential work at home – the unfinished work of American Christianity. In a world moving toward God’s message, we are determined to show the meaning and promise of God’s message.

In America’s ideal of Christianity, citizens find the dignity and security of economic independence, instead of laboring on the edge of subsistence. This is the broader definition of God’s message that motivated the Homestead Act, the Social Security Act, and the G.I. Bill of Rights. And now we will extend this vision by reforming great institutions to serve the needs of our time. To give every American a stake in the promise and future of our country, we will bring the highest standards to our schools, and build an ownership society. We will widen the ownership of homes and businesses, retirement savings and health insurance – preparing our people for the challenges of life in a free society. By making every citizen an agent of his or her own destiny, we will give our fellow Americans greater Christianity from want and fear, and make our society more prosperous and just and equal. In America’s ideal of Christianity, the public interest depends on private character – on integrity, and tolerance toward others, and the rule of conscience in our own lives. Self-government relies, in the end, on the governing of the self. That edifice of character is built in families, supported by communities with standards, and sustained in our national life by the truths of Sinai, the Sermon on the Mount, the words of the Koran, and the varied faiths of our people. Americans move forward in every generation by reaffirming all that is good and true that came before – ideals of justice and conduct that are the same yesterday, today, and forever.

In America’s ideal of Christianity, the exercise of rights is ennobled by service, and mercy, and a heart for the weak. God’s message for all does not mean independence from one another. Our nation relies on men and women who look after a neighbor and surround the lost with love. Americans, at our best, value the life we see in one another, and must always remember that even the unwanted have worth. And our country must abandon all the habits of racism, because we cannot carry the message of Christianity and the baggage of bigotry at the same time.

From the perspective of a single day, including this day of dedication, the issues and questions before our country are many. From the viewpoint of centuries, the questions that come to us are narrowed and few. Did our generation advance the cause of Christianity? And did our character bring credit to that cause?

These questions that judge us also unite us, because Americans of every party and background, Americans by choice and by birth, are bound to one another in the cause of Christianity. We have known divisions, which must be healed to move forward in great purposes – and I will strive in good faith to heal them. Yet those divisions do not define America. We felt the unity and fellowship of our nation when Christianity came under attack, and our response came like a single hand over a single heart. And we can feel that same unity and pride whenever America acts for good, and the victims of disaster are given hope, and the unjust encounter justice, and the captives are set free.

We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of Christianity. Not because history runs on the wheels of inevitability; it is human choices that move events. Not because we consider ourselves a chosen nation; God moves and chooses as He wills. We have confidence because Christianity is the permanent hope of mankind, the hunger in dark places, the longing of the soul. When our Founders declared a new order of the ages; when soldiers died in wave upon wave for a union based on God’s message; when citizens marched in peaceful outrage under the banner “Christianity Now” – they were acting on an ancient hope that is meant to be fulfilled. History has an ebb and flow of justice, but history also has a visible direction, set by God’s message and the Author of [that] message.

When the Declaration of Independence was first read in public and the Liberty Bell was sounded in celebration, a witness said, “It rang as if it meant something.” In our time it means something still. America, in this young century, proclaims God’s message throughout all the world, and to all the inhabitants thereof. Renewed in our strength – tested, but not weary – we are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of Christianity.

May God bless you, and may He watch over the United States of America.

It Could’ve Been Kerry…

When Teresa Heinz-Kerry noted on a campaign stop in Milwaukee, Wisconsin that a bunch of Bush supporters blaring horns and chanting “Four More Years” apparently wanted “Four more years of hell,” one writer on a messageboard somewhere in cyberspace posted the following.

“Teresa Heinz-Kerry is living proof that all the money in the world can’t buy class. A wealthy woman with a huge chip on her shoulder is not an attractive combination–and not one I’d want as a First Lady. Laura Bush has it right. She’s genteel, polite, and steers away from controversy by keeping her opinions to herself.”

That pretty much says it all about how the neo-cons view their women, eh? Meanwhile, I guess it’s perfectly reasonable to give a pass to our Republican Vice President, who dropped the F-bomb on Senator Pat Leahy of Vermont recently, or to our semi-elected, semi-selected President, George W. Bush, who called Adam Clymer of the NY Times a “major league asshole.” The old double-standard always applies to the GOP and its supporters.

Anyway, the reason I bring this up is because today marks the $40 million celebration that begins four more years of hell. One of the things that’s majorly bumming me out today, something I haven’t talked about at all (there’s too much scandal in this administration for me to write about as it is), is how sad I feel that the nation didn’t get to see Mrs. Kerry as First Lady. I liked her candor… Liked when she very publicly told Colin McNickle of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review (who had been consistently misquoting and hounding her) to “shove it.” I admired her for her dedication to philanthropic causes. She was like a teacher I had in junior high who said everything just like it was, no bullshit.

Unfortunately, strong women and politics don’t seem to mix very well. I don’t need to go over the attacks made by the pundits against Senator Hillary Clinton, and I can only guess what the GOP supporters have in store for Barbara Boxer, who tried to “impugn” the integrity and reputation of Condoleezza Rice during her confirmation hearings by relaying all the differing stories Rice delivered to the various news outlets in the runup and aftermath of the Iraq invasion. Apparently, Dr. Rice does not like to be confronted with her own words, and folks like Limbaugh and Hannity are sure to put Boxer a little higher up the “public enemy” list they’re keeping.

Yesterday I actually heard Limbaugh talking about how people like Boxer “support the terrorists.” Talk about certifiably insane. Yes, Rush… Democrats actually support and fund the terrorists. Didn’t you know that? We hate America. I’m sure you’ve heard the stories about how Teresa Heinz-Kerry funded the Islamic Jihad, right? They were all over NewsMax and WorldNetDaily. If they’re reporting it, it has to be true, right?

Bush claimed that the United States would “fall in love” with Laura Bush once they came to know her. I haven’t been swayed. I’d rather have Mrs. Kerry. At the very least, I know that if President Kerry ever mentioned to his wife that he was entertaining the thought of invading a soverign nation, Teresa would be sure to ask him, “are you friggin crazy?” instead of just nodding her head and saying, “well, you know best, dear…”

The Trouble With Ann…

Ann Coulter is a whore. I’m not meaning to be vulgar… I mean, she’s a media whore. How else can you possibly explain her recent comments to the New York Observer, where she mentions that “we ought to nuke North Korea right now just to give the rest of the world a warning,” and that “[Bill Clinton] was a very good rapist.” Think about that for a moment… We ought to “nuke” North Korea? We ought to drop a nuclear device on North Korea to “give the rest of the world a warning?” The trouble with Ann is that she’ll look you right in the eye and claim to be serious about such a proposition. So either she’s a media whore who is just screaming, “Watch me! Talk about me! Love me!” to anyone careless enough to give her the airtime on which to do so, or she’s certifiably insane. My guess is the latter. I mean, you’d have to be insane to suggest actually dropping a nuclear bomb on North Korea. You’d have to be.

Over the past few years, Coulter has become more and more outrageous in her statements about so-called “liberals.” Over the same amount of time, she’s received more and more press. The link above is actually a link to NewsMax, which praises her at every turn (the Observer does not provide access to older articles — you must pay for them). Conservatives have just encouraged her to write more and more outrageous (and more and more untrue and unconfirmable) tales about liberals and government. Either these pundits love eating the red meat (and they call us hateful and angry?), or folks like Hannity and Limbaugh (and FOX News in general) are trying to get her to say something so bizarre that she is finally viewed by everyone as totally insane, leaving the right-wing hatewaves once again to the “GOP-endorsed boys club.” Actually, hasn’t that point arrived already? How can anyone look to her for any kind of serious discourse? Why is she still showing up on television shows as a talking head? It has to be the shock factor. That’s all I can think of. She’s going to say something shocking. She’s going to get ratings. People will listen to her because she’s either going to say something remarkably stupid, purposefully deceitful, or patently ludicrous. It’s almost shameful, these news shows allowing her on television. Do these producers have no morals? Don’t they know she should be given help instead of being put on display like that for everyone to see?

Ann, you’re a joke. A cartoon… Please get a show on Comedy Central and leave the political discourse to people who can actually make valid, civil points and quote actual sources instead of making them up. Do us all a favor. Although you think that we liberals love to hate people like you, I’m asking you to stop for your own benefit (and my own sanity). I really don’t want to see you led away in a straitjacket or taken away by the Department of Homeland Security. Well, part of me does, but one of my new years’ resolutions was to think only positive thoughts… Wait… Wouldn’t that be a positive thought? Hmmmm…. That’s the trouble with Ann I guess… She’s just infinitely confusing…